Reflect

“Knowing yourself is the beginning of all wisdom.”

— Aristotle

Anonymous 360 feedback assessments and cultural diagnostics to fuel better business decisions and develop an organization’s most valuable assets - its people.

Assessment Models

  • A stack of six rectangular blocks arranged in a pyramid shape, with a separate, softer square block on top.

    Keystone

    Total organizational assessment through a multistage approach, covering key leadership positions, multiple levels of management, and all employees, with optional external inputs from clients, third-party firms, and organizational partners.

  • A stylized mountain with a flag at its peak, rendered in shades of blue and gray.

    Summit

    Designed to provide actionable results for tier-one leadership teams within an organization; expedited but concisely delivered to those working in fast-paced and sensitive areas of the business. Best for C-suite, board, and investor dynamics.

  • A 3D model of a cube composed of smaller black cubes with one white cube at the center, arranged in a 3x3x3 formation on a gray background.

    Mosaic

    A strategic cultural assessment designed to offer key atmospherics within an organization and its people; facilitated directly through senior management alongside a strategic plan for total organizational development. Targets workplace climate, inter- and intra-team dynamics, and cultural gaps.

  • 3D icons of people arranged with a larger person in the front and two smaller people behind, encircled by a ring, representing a group or community.

    Halo

    Team-oriented package covering both individual and group assessments, designed to analyze intra-team dynamics, strengths, and areas for improvement. Ideal for peer and near-peer group constructs such as legal, engineering, maritime, and other professionally licensed firms.

  • Four black spherical objects evenly spaced, floating above a gray surface with faint shadows.

    Axis

    Manager package designed to develop mid-level managers with three or more direct reports. Assessment leverages three dimensions of feedback: peer, subordinate, and supervisor input.

  • A stylized light bulb with elongated black capsules surrounding it, set against a light gray background.

    Lumen

    Employee package designed to aid managers and supervisors in developing their subordinates through self, peer, and supervisor feedback.

360 Anonymous Feedback Assessments

  • A 360 Anonymous Feedback Assessment is a confidential tool that collects performance feedback from multiple sources—supervisors, peers, subordinates, and sometimes external stakeholders. It gives individuals and organizations a clearer view of strengths, weaknesses, and blind spots. Widely respected in professional settings, the 360 provides practical data that supports better decisions around talent development, leadership growth, and team performance.


    The assessment promotes accountability and self-awareness by highlighting how others perceive an individual’s behavior and impact. Anonymity encourages honest feedback, often surfacing issues that typical reviews miss. For organizations, it reveals leadership gaps and team dynamics. For individuals, it shows where they align or misalign with expectations. When followed by coaching or development, it becomes a powerful tool for lasting improvement.

  • Recognized as one of the most effective tools for leadership and employee development, 360° feedback is widely used by Fortune 100 companies. According to a 2021 report by the Center for Creative Leadership (CCL), more than 85% of Fortune 500 companies use some form of 360° feedback to develop leadership and enhance organizational culture. Additionally, research by the Harvard Business Review and SHRM (Society for Human Resource Management) highlights the tool’s effectiveness in aligning behaviors with company values, improving managerial decision-making, and identifying development opportunities.

  • While many organizations have the internal capabilities to conduct an anonymous 360° feedback assessment, doing so often comes with hidden costs. The effectiveness of a 360° assessment depends heavily on confidentiality and the creation of a psychologically safe environment—one where participants feel comfortable providing honest, unfiltered feedback.

    When assessments are run internally, even under the promise of anonymity, concerns can arise. Biases, pre-existing relationships, and internal politics may influence responses or discourage transparency. These dynamics can compromise the integrity of the feedback and lead to outcomes that are incomplete, skewed, or unproductive. According to the Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM), trust in the feedback process is one of the top predictors of participation quality and long-term development impact.

    Beyond anonymity and bias, the design and delivery of the assessment itself are critical. Poorly structured 360° feedback tools—often created without validated questions, clear benchmarks, or an understanding of behavioral science—can produce misleading or unusable results. Research published in the Journal of Applied Psychology shows that professional facilitation significantly increases the accuracy of feedback interpretation and follow-through on development goals. Trained facilitators ensure that the process is grounded in best practices, the right stakeholders are engaged, and feedback is synthesized into actionable insights—not just reports.

  • Traditional due diligence focuses on financials, operations, and legal risk—but the success or failure of a deal often hinges on people. Leadership, team dynamics, and culture directly impact integration, retention, and long-term performance.

    360° feedback offers a clear, structured view into:

    • Leadership strengths and blind spots

    • Team functionality and internal dynamics

    • Cultural alignment or disconnects

    • Key talent and flight-risk identification

    These insights are critical for evaluating management risk, planning post-close integration, and avoiding hidden costs that derail ROI. Studies show that poor cultural fit and leadership breakdowns are leading causes of M&A failure—issues traditional diligence often misses.

    A well-run, external 360° assessment adds a layer of truth that numbers alone can’t provide—helping investors and executives make smarter, more informed decisions about the people driving the business forward.