Reflect

“Knowing yourself is the beginning of all wisdom.”

— Aristotle

Anonymous 360 feedback assessments and cultural diagnostics to organizations so that they can make better business decisions and develop their most valuable assets - people.

Assessment Models

  • A stack of six rectangular blocks arranged in a pyramid shape, with a separate, softer square block on top.

    Keystone

    Total organizational assessment through a multistage approach, covering key leadership positions, multiple levels of management, and all employees, with optional external inputs from clients, third-party firms, and organizational partners.

  • A stylized mountain with a flag at its peak, rendered in shades of blue and gray.

    Summit

    Designed to provide actionable results for tier-one leadership teams within the organization; expedited but concisely delivered to those working in fast-paced and sensitive areas of the business. Best for C-suite, board, and investor dynamics.

  • A 3D model of a cube composed of smaller black cubes with one white cube at the center, arranged in a 3x3x3 formation on a gray background.

    Mosaic

    A strategic cultural assessment designed to offer key atmospherics within an organization and its people; facilitated directly through senior management alongside a strategic plan for total organizational development. Targets workplace climate, inter- and intra-team dynamics, and cultural gaps.

  • 3D icons of people arranged with a larger person in the front and two smaller people behind, encircled by a ring, representing a group or community.

    Halo

    Team-oriented package covering both individual and group assessments, designed to analyze intra-team dynamics, strengths, and areas for improvement. Ideal for peer and near-peer group constructs such as legal, engineering, maritime, and other professionally licensed firms.

  • Four black spherical objects evenly spaced, floating above a gray surface with faint shadows.

    Axis

    Manager package designed to develop mid-level managers with three or more direct reports. Assessment leverages three dimensions of feedback: peer, subordinate, and supervisor input.

  • A stylized light bulb with elongated black capsules surrounding it, set against a light gray background.

    Lumen

    Employee package designed to aid managers and supervisors in developing their subordinates through self, peer, and supervisor feedback.

360 Anonymous Feedback Assessments

  • A 360 Anonymous Feedback Assessment is a confidential tool that collects performance feedback from multiple sources—supervisors, peers, subordinates, and sometimes external stakeholders. It gives individuals and organizations a clearer view of strengths, weaknesses, and blind spots. Widely respected in professional settings, the 360 provides practical data that supports better decisions around talent development, leadership growth, and team performance.


    The assessment promotes accountability and self-awareness by highlighting how others perceive an individual’s behavior and impact. Anonymity encourages honest feedback, often surfacing issues that typical reviews miss. For organizations, it reveals leadership gaps and team dynamics. For individuals, it shows where they align or misalign with expectations. When followed by coaching or development, it becomes a powerful tool for lasting improvement.

  • It all begins with an idea. Maybe you want to launch a business. Maybe you want to turn a hobby into something more. Or maybe you have a creative project to share with the world. Whatever it is, the way you tell your story online can make all the difference.

  • While many organizations have the internal capabilities to conduct an anonymous 360° feedback assessment, doing so often comes with hidden costs. The effectiveness of a 360° assessment depends heavily on confidentiality and the creation of a psychologically safe environment—one where participants feel comfortable providing honest, unfiltered feedback.

    When assessments are run internally, even under the promise of anonymity, concerns can arise. Biases, pre-existing relationships, and internal politics may influence responses or discourage transparency. These dynamics can compromise the integrity of the feedback and lead to outcomes that are incomplete, skewed, or unproductive. According to the Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM), trust in the feedback process is one of the top predictors of participation quality and long-term development impact.

    Beyond anonymity and bias, the design and delivery of the assessment itself are critical. Poorly structured 360° feedback tools—often created without validated questions, clear benchmarks, or an understanding of behavioral science—can produce misleading or unusable results. Research published in the Journal of Applied Psychology shows that professional facilitation significantly increases the accuracy of feedback interpretation and follow-through on development goals. Trained facilitators ensure that the process is grounded in best practices, the right stakeholders are engaged, and feedback is synthesized into actionable insights—not just reports.